An 'integrated PR campaign' according to the CIPR is 'a campaign which demonstrates the integrated use of communications, including marketing and advertising, which is led by public relations in order to achieve its objectives'. Ok, fair enough so far. An integrated campaign consists of PR, Marketing and Advertising strategies. Brilliant! The point that is being missed here that this is reality already. The name 'integrated' is simply outdated.
The lines are blurring. What about the PESO model? Paid, earned, shared and owned media. Who is responsible for that? Marketing because of the paid part? PR because of the earned part? See where I'm going with this?
Source: www.PRweek.com |
Source: www.online-income.xyz |
I am also currently working on a project with my former lecturer to analyse how the careers in Marketing, PR, Advertising and Journalism (yes!) are converging. We are building a database with all Solent alumni in the respective jobs from the last years. We then check which responsibilities (PR, Marketing etc.) these jobs contain.
In the past I noticed that often PR and Marketing acted as opponents because the responsibilities were not clear. Many Marketing people want to see PR as a part of Marketing while PR wants to be independent from all this.
We have to stop this and start working together to achieve our best results for our clients and companies. This doesn't work as long as we have separate PR-, Marketing- and Advertising-departments. The solutions are 'integrated' courses at university (such as the 'new' PR Masters at Solent University which as of 2016 will be known as Master of 'PR and Multimedia Communications'). Integrated PR & Marketing Agencies will be the future.
Read more here.
Read more here.
PS. PR rocks! ;)